If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." Get ABC Sciences weekly newsletter Science Updates, The 'underground astronaut' in search of ancient bones, Voyager probes still signalling from the edge of the Solar System, Solar eclipses: Everything you need to know, Five ways your smartphone could help save lives, Chinese scientists use satellite to smash quantum entanglement record, Einstein's light bending theory directly observed in distant stars for first time, Third gravitational wave detection puts new spin on black holes. Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. asks nothing but . If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. So what constitutes quantum quackery? https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? She does play a large role in the movie and you can read all about her nonsense here. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. About. Answer: Photographer. During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. So far, so good. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. Study Guide", "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience", "Review: What The Bleep Do We Know!? Unfortunately hes written no papers after 1995, see, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=find+a+hagelin&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=. But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. The observer can't be ignored." Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . Down The Rabbit Hole\". ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. Nasa found something. has been described as "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ and other films that adhere to traditional religious teachings. Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. We'll never know. But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. What the Bleep!? 2. [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. We are connected to the world by many things: by light and sound and heat. Certainly, our attitudes and brain chemistry affect how we see the world and get through life. "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". Though not marketed as such, those who have seen it note that it degenerates into an extended infomercial for channeler J. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. 1. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. Featuring two (!) On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. A: Of course it does. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. John Haglin A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. Now comes the audio edition of the book based on the mind-boggling movie that grossed $11 million in the U.S. alone. D (k)ow!? That would be, very hard to quantify:). is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. It's certainly not. The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. Lawrence Krauss: I think it's probably one of the most abused concepts in physics among the public. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. Hope you dont mind me butting in, just thought you might like to see these facts which are so far undisputed about the film. Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. After a lesson in quantum mechanics from a precocious kid on a . "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? You are free to comment as you wish. And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. 4. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. Our work isn't possible without your support. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. 7. They don't go anywhere, Fred. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU Supported by groups like the Templeton Foundation, legitimateor more creative scientists are exploring the mind-body connection, or the similarities between particle-and-wave physics and certain religious concepts like the Trinity. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? To date, Dr Emoto has not taken up the challenge. In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. 3. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. !" is a radical departure from convention. "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." Your subscription to It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. By continuing to browse the site Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. What could be worse than being aware of every tiny detail that your brain handles from phosphate levels to heart rate and hair growth. Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . He has however just released his third book of pretty crystal pictures. Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. Consciousness must be involved. There's nothing wrong with that. Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? That's why we experience a classical world. Joe Dispenza ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. [2]. Do We Know!?) And I came out of wanting to meditate more often, which can't be a bad thing. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. continue to use the site without a "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. He claims the drop was achieved. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. Not exactly, Amit. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." " " what the bleep do we know ( 2 ) Full HD 2 . It was really hard to sit through. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it.